The U.S. Supreme Court has said that, oh no, we will NOT get to watch YouTube videos of the federal court challenge to Prop 8. The reason is because that the people who are defending God, the California Constitution and everything moral, decent, upright, sweet, pure, loving, and harmonious are going to be intimidated when some smartass pansy attorney asks "Exactly how much do you hate those fags?" I don't know why anyone who has God and the California Constitution (not to mention the LDS church) on their side would be intimidated into lying under oath when questioned. But ...

A real initiative approved for petition circulation by the Attorney General. 1379. (09-0026) Eliminates the Law Allowing Married Couples to Divorce. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. Summary Date: 10/23/09 | Circulation Deadline: 03/22/10 | Signatures Required: 694,354 Proponent: John Marcotte Changes the California Constitution to eliminate the ability of married couples to get divorced in California. Preserves the ability of married couples to seek an annulment. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Savings to the state of up to hundreds of millions of dollars annually for support of the court system due ...

Accordimg to Rex Wockner, the language of the ballot measure to be submitted to the California Supreme Court shall be:This amendment would amend an existing section of the California Constitution. Existing language proposed to be deleted is printed in strikeout type. Language proposed to be added is printed in underlined type.Section 1. To protect religious freedom, no court shall interpret this measure to require any priest, minister, pastor, rabbi, or other person authorized to perform marriages by any religious denomination, church, or other non-profit religious institution to perform any marriage in violation of his or her religious beliefs. The refusal ...